Recently a dialog on whether designers or promoters can offer stilt parking spot to purchasers in a lodging society came up in a urban improvement division meeting. In a portion of the 2BHK and 3 BHK plans crosswise over real urban areas in the state, manufacturers were blamed for unlawfully offering space, said as basic luxuries under the improvement control directions, for a charge.
The authorities refered to three cases in Mumbai high court on the issue where the stilt parking spot is nor being deciphered as a space characterized as a “level” or a “carport” according to winning controls.
“No developer can offer parking spot in Maharashtra as the Bombay high court has decided that a stilt parking spot is a typical parking spot accessible to individuals from the lodging society,” says a senior urban improvement official.
“Couple of years prior, a Supreme Court seat of Justices A K Patnaik and R M Lodha had decided that manufacturers or promoters can’t offer stopping ranges as autonomous units or pads as these territories seem to be ‘normal zone and offices’ for the individuals,” includes the authority.
Sources in the urban advancement power assert that an uncommon strategy on stopping for the city is being planned. “In Mumbai we went over that each part is apportioned only one stilt parking spot. In the event that the part requires additional space he can be appointed the space by the general public just if some other part does not require any,” says the authority.